Command and Sustainment in the PLA Army Service Support Brigade

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Army service support brigade (SSB) serves as the nerve center and physical foundation for a modern group army (GA) by establishing, operating, and protecting its critical command post (CP). To maintain and shield the headquarters’ multidomain connectivity, half of the SSB’s structure is dedicated to a digital nervous system” consisting of command, control, communications, and electronic countermeasure battalions. The remaining half acts as an operational sustainment engine, utilizing specialized guard, repair, and transportation battalions to physically secure the perimeter while providing theater-level maintenance and logistical mobility. Despite these robust capabilities, the SSB exhibits key vulnerabilities—including risk-averse peacetime training habits and heavy transport bottlenecks—that present opportunities to disrupt the GA’s command links and operational tempo.

While Western analysis of the PLA Army’s sweeping 2015-2017 structural reforms has heavily prioritized the modernization and lethality of newly formed combined-arms brigades (CABs), less attention has been paid to new formations that came out of the same reorganizations. Of these, the SSB is particularly critical. Often viewed strictly through the lens of logistics, the SSB’s mandate extends far beyond supply distribution. Uniquely tasked with the establishment, operation, and protection of the GA CP, the SSB serves as the nerve center and physical foundation of the GA, arguably making it the most important brigade within the GA structure.

The SSB ensures the GA commander and political commissar can see, communicate, and direct the fight. The SSB provides vital signal architecture that connects the GA headquarters up to theater commands and down to subordinate maneuver units alongside the organic sustainment required to maintain operational reach. Its eight distinct battalions execute the dual mission of sustaining the combat force and defending the GA’s most critical command nodes.

Figure 1: There are eight battalions in a PLA Army service support brigade, including two repair battalions and two signals battalions—one for trunkline network communications and the other for mobile communications. (Source: T2COM G-2)

COMMAND AND CONTROL, COMMUNICATIONS, AND SPECTRUM MANAGEMENT

If the SSB is the nerve center of the GA, the brigade’s four communications and control battalions form the main physical and digital branches of nervous system. Fully half of the SSB’s battalion-level structure is dedicated not to logistics or repair, but to the establishment, connectivity, and protection of the command architecture—an indicator of PLA informationized operational concepts. Without these elements, the GA commander and political officer cannot maneuver forces, coordinate joint fires, or sustain operational tempo.

Command-and-Control Battalion

The command-and-control (C2) battalion forms the physical and digital core of the GA CP. While maneuver brigades fight the battle, the C2 battalion constructs and maintains the battle management system. Serving as the operational brain of the SSB, it is directly responsible for the deployment, technical integration, and defense of the mobile CP. Modern PLA C2 battalions are mechanized forces tasked with establishing complex data links and coordinating multiservice networks in austere environments. Personnel within this battalion manage the multidomain fusion required to integrate Army nodes with external joint assets, such as PLA Air Force early warning systems.[1] Consequently, their training heavily prioritizes rapid mobility and survivability under combat conditions. For example, tactical drills conducted by the 78th GA SSB’s C2 battalion in 2020 required units to aggressively maneuver communication vehicles through complex terrain while actively surviving simulated air strikes and tactical ambushes, ensuring the “nerve center” remains functional even while on the move.[2]

Organizationally, the C2 battalion is standardized into three subordinate companies that have been deliberately reorganized to support the PLA’s concepts of highly mobile operations. Assessments of units like the 71st GA SSB’s C2 Battalion in 2022 indicated a deliberate shift away from traditional infantry-style squad and platoon formations in favor of vehicle-centric organization. In this framework, the foundational maneuver element within the three companies is the command cabin. Each command cabin operates as an independent node and functional group, housing the specialized servers, communication terminals, and staff necessary to run a specific command function.[3] This modular structure effectively turns each of the battalion’s three companies into a collection of mobile, interconnected data nodes rather than traditional troop formations.

Because the CP is a unified network, the three companies must operate with seamless integration and balanced proficiency rather than isolated specialization. The PLA explicitly evaluates the C2 battalion’s combat effectiveness based on the three companies’ overall ability to work in concert to sustain the command architecture. Evidence of this includes a 2021 training evaluation within the 83rd GA SSB’s C2 battalion, in which the 3rd Company won a higher-echelon, single-subject communications competition but was outranked by the 2nd Company in the overall battalion evaluation because the 2nd Company maintained a more balanced, comprehensive proficiency across all required C2 tasks.[4] This systemic, interdependent approach ensures that the three companies can rapidly assemble the CP’s architecture, disperse the vehicle nodes to mitigate electromagnetic signatures, and sustain C2 for the GA commander and political commissar without any single point of failure.

Trunkline Network Communications Battalion

One of two specialized signals battalions, the trunkline network communications battalion provides the heavy-bandwidth operational connectivity required for a GA to function within a modern, multidomain battlefield. While the mobile communications battalion handles tactical, short-range relays, the trunkline battalion establishes the “battlefield backbone network.” This unit is responsible for pushing massive amounts of data over long distances, serving as the high-capacity conduit that links the GA CP directly upward to the theater command and the joint staff department and horizontally to other GAs.[5] This bandwidth is essential for the GA staff to pull joint intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) feeds, receive operational updates, and integrate with joint fires architectures without suffering loss of connectivity or slow speeds. This capability is the essence of the PLA’s informationized way of war—and developing intelligentized operations concept—enabling the integration of AI into situational awareness tools like the integrated command platform for decisionmaking on the battlefield.[6]

Figure 2: These images show a PLA Southern Theater Command SSB setting up an additional mast from a trunkline node vehicle, likely to extend the network’s reach. (Source: AI generated using Nano Banana 2)

Organizationally, the battalion is divided into three specialized companies tasked with deploying both wired and wireless wide bandwidth nodes. These three companies operate dedicated trunkline node vehicles, heavy satellite communication terminals, high-capacity microwave relays, troposcatter communications, and long-distance fiber-optic cable-laying vehicles necessary to build a secure wide-area network. Because these companies operate large numbers of heavy vehicles, managing their physical and electromagnetic signatures is an acknowledged vulnerability. Chinese media reporting highlighted these issues during a 2022 high-echelon assessment of the 72nd GA SSB’s trunkline network communications battalion. While the battalion’s 2nd Company successfully deployed standard camouflage netting and implemented emissions control protocols in less than 10 minutes, their position was compromised and destroyed by simulated enemy artillery because low-altitude reconnaissance drones easily identified the vehicle tracks their heavy communication platforms left in fresh mud.[7]

The operational demands on these companies are intense; they are expected to deploy their transmission nodes over expansive, unfamiliar terrain while maintaining network stability. News reports on the training evaluation of the 83rd GA SSB trunkline battalion in 2021 emphasized the requirement for its companies to conduct long-distance maneuvers and rapidly establish a battlefield backbone network under simulated combat conditions, often pushing their transmission equipment to its absolute design limits to maximize the network’s coverage area.[8]

Figure 3: PLA Army SSB Troposcatter Communications Vehicle (Source: AI generated using Nano Banana 2)

The incorporation of the trunkline network communications battalion in the SSB reduces the reliance of GA command structure on theater army information support brigades. However, this centralization of communications also concentrates immense risk within the brigade. Driven by lessons learned from recent conflicts about the vulnerability of these types of systems to unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) attack, the PLA has adopted new procedures shifting these battalions away from static, predictable dispositions in training. Trunkline battalions are moving from directly next to CPs to a more dispersed posture for communication hubs to prevent electronic warfare (EW) units from targeting both simultaneously. They are increasingly making greater use of multiple decoy signal sources and other types of radio deception to break through enemy “electromagnetic fog.”[9]

Mobile Communications Battalion

The mobile communications battalion is the brigade’s second signals battalion and serves as the link between higher echelon “nerve centers” down to combat brigades. A GA’s maneuver elements—combined-arms, aviation, and similar brigades—often risk outdistancing the communications links to each other and to higher echelons. The mobile communications battalion prevents this by communicating on the move, pushing tactical network connectivity directly to the forward line of troops. By deploying mobile radio access points and supporting microwave and satellite relay nodes, this battalion ensures that the GA commander and political commissar maintain continuous voice and data links with forward formations, even as the operational environment rapidly shifts.[10]

Figure 4: PLA Army SSB Radio Access Point Vehicle (Source: AI generated using Nano Banana 2)

Unlike the heavy, less mobile infrastructure managed by the trunkline units, the mobile communications battalion’s three companies are designed for rapid emplacement, operation, and displacement. They are often organized into small, dispersed detachments, establishing relay sites on high ground or pushing forward to connect in distance-limiting complex terrain.[11] These companies must rely on dismounted elements when operating under restrictive emission control or pushing signals through complex terrain where vehicles cannot travel. For example, a PLA media profile of an SSB in 2020 highlighted the use of ‘wire squads’ that manually carried heavy spools of tactical field cable on their backs. Chinese media highlighted the physical hardship of laying hundreds of kilometers of tactical lines through mountainous, densely vegetated terrain, which was critical in guaranteeing connectivity where wireless relays would be intercepted or blocked.[12] By combining vehicle-mounted nodes and dismounted wire squads, the three companies weave together a dynamic, regenerative tactical mesh network across vast distances.

The operational demands placed on the mobile communications battalion are uniquely grueling, characterized by constant movement and the requirement to survive in highly contested environments. These forward-deployed relay nodes are prime targets for enemy EW and precision fires because they have significant electromagnetic signatures. Consequently, PLA training for this battalion heavily emphasizes survivability under complex electromagnetic conditions. Exercises routinely force these companies to operate under intense simulated jamming, requiring them to rapidly switch frequencies, establish alternative routing, or physically displace their vehicles to evade strikes and restore the network.[13] This relentless focus on rapid maneuver and network resilience ensures that the SSB can sustain an unbroken chain of command, even when the tactical network is actively degraded by the enemy.[14]

Electronic Countermeasures Battalion

The electronic countermeasures (ECM) battalion is a key part of SSB’s defenses but comes at the cost of a massive, highly detectable electromagnetic signature. While the PLA’s CABs possess their own tactical EW units, the SSB’s ECM battalion operates at the operational echelon to protect the GA’s CP in the electromagnetic domain.[15] Its primary mandate is to manage the electromagnetic spectrum for the headquarters footprint, detect adversary electronic reconnaissance, and blind enemy ISR assets before they can target the “nerve center” with long-range precision fires.

Figure 5: An EW Jamming Vehicle in the 77th GA SSB ECM Battalion (Source: AI generated using Nano Banana 2)

The ECM battalion is subdivided into specialized companies tailored for EW functions, including electronic reconnaissance, electronic attack or jamming, and UAV operations. Specifically, PLA media coverage of the battalion’s training has highlighted the presence of at least two shortwave jamming companies. The inclusion of dedicated shortwave jamming elements demonstrates the battalion is designed not only for local CP defense, but also for offensive EW attacks to degrade or cut an adversary’s long-range, over-the-horizon backup C2 links.[16] These ground-based jamming and reconnaissance companies deploy a sophisticated fleet of highly mobile, vehicle-mounted platforms equipped with phased-array antennas, passive sensors, and heavy signal-processing cabins. Simultaneously, the battalion’s organic UAV company serves as an airborne force multiplier. Its EW drones conduct deep spectrum mapping and airborne jamming that effectively overcomes the line-of-sight limitations of ground vehicles, pushing the electromagnetic shield further out from the CP.[17]

In practice, the ECM battalion’s employment is fully integrated with the brigade’s communications elements to ensure the survivability of the CP under complex electromagnetic conditions. PLA media frequently highlights the grueling, fast-paced nature of ECM field training, where units like the shortwave jamming companies must rapidly deploy alongside C2 elements and immediately establish an electromagnetic defensive umbrella.[18] During force-on-force exercises, ECM companies are evaluated on their ability to execute electromagnetic feints—using decoy transmitters to spoof enemy sensors and draw fire away from actual C2 nodes—and their speed in executing precise jamming missions to paralyze simulated enemy command links.[19] If successful in masking the CP’s emissions and blinding the enemy, the ECM battalion guarantees the GA commander and political commissar can orchestrate the multidomain fight without the headquarters being decapitated.

SHIELD AND INFRASTRUCTURE: PROTECTING AND SUSTAINING THE CP

While the communication battalions and associated ECM battalion act as connecting nerves and protective tissues for the GA’s CP, those networks cannot function without a physical foundation. In the modern multidomain battlespace, a headquarters echelon is a massive, highly detectable, and inherently vulnerable footprint. Therefore, the SSB must have organic, multidomain defenses to defend the perimeter and sustainment infrastructure to keep the command staff alive, mobile, and functioning. This dual requirement for physical security and continuous support is executed by the brigade’s sustainment and headquarters defense elements, specifically the guard and service battalion.

Guard and Service Battalion

As the “nerve center” of a massive, multidomain combat force, the PLA recognizes the GA headquarters as a prime target for enemy special operations forces (SOF), long-range precision fires, and decapitation strikes. The guard and service battalions protect, move, and sustain this headquarters footprint.

The battalion is structured around distinct security and life-support functions. To handle the complex challenge of defending a highly mobile CP, the battalion utilizes a specialized guard and traffic control company. The guard element is responsible for the immediate physical security of the CP. This entails establishing a defensive perimeter, managing strict access control, and deploying sentries directly at the headquarters gate. For example, PLA media has explicitly profiled the 80th GA SSB’s guard and traffic control company, highlighting sentries’ role in securing the main headquarters against unauthorized access.[20] PLA training emphasizes constant vigilance to protect the headquarters against sudden strikes, frequently running emergency assembly drills requiring soldiers to rapidly execute emergency response protocols and ensure the perimeter remains secure against unexpected threats.[21]

Crucially, the traffic control function of this company highlights the modern requirement for CP survivability: rapid displacement. The heavy vehicular footprint of the CP is easily detectable by modern reconnaissance, meaning the headquarters cannot remain static. When the GA commander and political commissar order the CP to jump, the traffic control elements deploy forward to conduct route reconnaissance, mark concealed avenues of approach, and establish traffic control posts. They manage the massive flow of headquarters vehicles through complex terrain, choke points, and blackout conditions, ensuring the CP can smoothly displace and re-establish its perimeter before the enemy’s kill chain can close.[22]

Meanwhile, the service company manages the immense logistical and infrastructural burden of running the CP in austere environments. They are responsible for providing critical support, including mess operations, ensuring the staff can operate continuously without drawing on external combined-arms resources. Operating under the PLA mindset that “if the front lines are to win battles, the rear must also win battles,” the service company’s ability to execute long-range maneuvers and maintain high-quality life support under field conditions is treated as a direct contributor to the headquarters’ operational endurance.[23]

THE OPERATIONAL SUSTAINMENT ENGINE: REPAIR AND TRANSPORTATION

While protecting and connecting the GA’s CP is the SSB’s most critical headquarters function, its largest physical footprint is dedicated to theater-level sustainment. A modern PLA Army GA commands multiple heavy, medium, or light CABs, generating an immense daily requirement for maintenance, recovery, and resupply. Tactical brigades possess organic support battalions for immediate, frontline needs, but they lack the depth for heavy battle damage repair or theater-level stockpiling. The SSB serves as the operational sustainment engine, bridging the gap between strategic logistics nodes and the tactical edge.

Repair Battalions

To sustain the high-intensity operational tempo of a GA, the SSB fields two distinct repair battalions. Each of these battalions is comprised of approximately 180-200 personnel organized into three companies. Across the brigade’s six total repair companies, the units possess a wide array of capabilities designed to repair armor, vehicles, electronics, communications systems, and other complex equipment. Rather than specializing in a single platform, PLA technicians are expected to be capable of repairing multiple systems within a similar category. For example, an artillery technician assigned to the brigade must be proficient in servicing firepower systems on armored vehicles, ground suppression weapons, and air defense platforms.[24]

The primary mandate of these battalions is executing second-line, or medium-level, repairs. This level of maintenance requires highly trained repair units and exceeds the first-line, light repair capabilities organic to the maneuver and fire support brigades. When deployed to support operations, these battalions push forward to establish austere field repair sites. According to PLA media profiling the 83rd GA’s SSB, these forward nodes are highly structured and subdivided into specific functional zones, including a hoisting area, a chassis maintenance area, an artillery maintenance area, and a small-specialty maintenance area. During combat operations, these battalions serve as force multipliers by pushing specialized electrical, chassis, fire control, and communications teams forward to supplement frontline units and execute rapid battle damage repair.[25]

Despite these organizational capabilities, the PLA struggles with the transition from static, garrison-based depots to field maintenance. Media reporting on the 83rd GA SSB highlighted a training shortfall where a repair detachment failed to execute heavy hoisting tasks at a field site within the required time limits. The investigation revealed a persistent, risk-averse peacetime mentality: to ensure safety and avoid the high risks of field hoisting, the unit had been conducting the most difficult disassemblies back at the main garrison repair facility before sending the stripped components forward to the field units. This artificial separation of tasks—often resulting in hollow first-time training achievements—highlights the ongoing challenge the SSBs face in executing complex, heavy battle damage repair under austere field conditions.[26]

Transportation Service Battalion

The transportation service battalion provides the GA with its organic operational mobility and resupply backbone. Organizationally, this battalion is divided into three functional companies: a general transportation company, a service transportation company, and a heavy equipment transporter (HET) company.

The general transportation company operates approximately 40 trucks designed for moving personnel and equipment, although the PLA has not standardized a single chassis for this role. The legacy Shaanxi SX2110, capable of transporting 5 tons on-road and 3.5 tons off-road, remains widely fielded, but the modern First Auto Works MV3 armored medium high-mobility truck is becoming increasingly prevalent. The service transportation company is similarly structured, utilizing comparable vehicle numbers and types to execute broader logistics support missions.[27]

Figure 6: Taian TA4360 Heavy Transporter (Source: AI generated using Nano Banana 2)

The HET company is the battalion’s most critical asset for armored power projection. Equipped with approximately 30 to 40 heavy transporters, the bulk of this force is based on the Taian TA4360, a 4-axle semitrailer capable of hauling 50 tons, alongside older 40-ton Shaanxi SX4323A platforms. The PLA also fields the newer 5-axle Taian TA4410 (left) capable of transporting up to 65 tons, which is notably the only HET in the inventory capable of carrying the PLA’s heaviest Type-99 and Type-99A main battle tanks. These vehicles are vital for moving GA assets to combat zones and evacuating damaged heavy platforms back to the rear-area repair battalions. Despite these capabilities, the relatively small number of organic HETs is insufficient to fully support the GA’s heavy CABs, leaving the PLA heavily reliant on civilian or militia assets to meet its heavy transport requirements.[28]

IMPLICATIONS FOR THE U.S. ARMY

The structural and operational evolution of the PLA SSB reveals a highly centralized, yet inherently vulnerable node in the PLA’s operational system of systems. While the brigade provides the GA commander and political commissar with organic capabilities to maneuver, conceal, and sustain the headquarters, it creates a massive electromagnetic footprint and relies on unproven field capabilities.

• Bureaucratic Rigidity in Network Triage. PLA signal elements struggle to separate administrative hierarchy from tactical necessity under fire.[29] Overcoming entrenched “peacetime disease” habits may prove difficult for PLA technicians when adversary EW and cyber fires overwhelm their trunkline and mobile communications battalions. This could force SSB elements into complex triage scenarios, such as prioritizing the repair of a rear-echelon reserve unit over a frontline maneuver unit, and lead to the severing of command links and the paralysis of PLA combat forces.
• CP Displacement Cycle. The GA headquarters’ footprint—both vehicles and emissions—means that it cannot remain static. Because the guard and traffic control company must deploy forward to establish traffic control posts and mark routes, specific traffic control signatures may present discernible indicators of an impending headquarters jump.[30]
• The ECM “Shield” Against Precision Fires. The ECM battalion is the organic shield designed to protect the “nerve center.” Operational-level jamming, electromagnetic camouflage, and UAV-enabled spectrum mapping directly surrounding the headquarters protect the GA’s CP from precision fires.[31] The PLA deploys ECM capabilities more densely than other nations’ militaries, potentially challenging traditional advantages in U.S. fires capabilities.
• “Peacetime Mentality” and Maintenance Shortfalls. Despite fielding dedicated repair battalions with robust organizational structures, PLA maintenance units have regularly exhibited severe risk aversion. Their documented reluctance to execute difficult, hazardous tasks—such as heavy chassis hoisting—at austere forward field sites in favor of relying on static garrison depots suggests that their actual combat regeneration capabilities are likely brittle.[32]
• Heavy Lift and Transport Bottleneck. The transportation service battalion lacks the organic HETs required to independently sustain the GA’s armored and heavy CABs.[33] Because the PLA is highly reliant on civilian and militia integration to make up for this shortfall, damage to this susceptible transport backbone would severely degrade the GA’s operational mobility and prevent the evacuation of heavy casualties back to the repair battalions.

 

*The T2COM G-2 wishes to thank Mr. Joshua Arostegui from the U.S. Army War College’s China Landpower Studies Center for contributing this article to the Red Diamond.

__________________

REFERENCES

[1] Chen Yu [陈羽] and Ren Yilin [任一林], “第七十八集团军：昂首迈向现代化新型陆军 [78th Group Army: Marching Towards a Modernized New Type of Army],” PLA Daily [解放军报], November 3, 2021, hxxp://military.people.com.cn/n1/2021/1103/c1011-32272339.html.

[2] Wang Zining [王子宁] et al., “深山腹地，官兵们上演现实版‘生死时速’ [Deep in the Mountains, Soldiers Staged a Real-Life ‘Race Against Time’],” 中国网 [China Network], July 29, 2020, hxxp://military.china.com.cn/2020-07/29/content_76324246.htm.

[3] Jing Zhou [靖周] et al., “第七十一集团军某旅指挥控制营二连创新开展‘三互’活动 – 中国军网 [The 2nd Company of the Command and Control Battalion of a Brigade Under the 71st Group Army Innovatively Carried Out the ‘Three Mutuals’ Activity],” 中国军网 [China Military Online], April 13, 2022, hxxp://www.81.cn/yw_208727/10147629.html.

[4] Liu Jianwei [刘建伟] et al., “第83集团军某旅年度军事训练总结大会，抓训‘三问’成焦点 [At the Annual Military Training Summary Meeting of a Brigade of the 83rd Group Army, Three Key Questions Regarding Training Became the Focus],” 中国军网 [China Military Online], December 21, 2021, hxxp://www.mod.gov.cn/gfbw/wzll/yw_214068/4901499.html.

[5] Cai Wanpeng [蔡婉芃] et al., “野外驻训载誉而归，这个旅的官兵用行动提升战力！ [Returning Triumphantly from Field Training, the Officers and Soldiers of This Brigade Have Enhanced Their Combat Capabilities Through Action!],” 新浪军事 [Sina Military], July 13, 2018, hxxp://mil.news.sina.com.cn/2018-07-13/doc-ihfefkqr3696392.shtml.

[6] Zoe Haver, “Artificial Eyes: Generative AI in China’s Military Intelligence,” Recorded Future, June 17, 2025, https://www.recordedfuture.com/research/artificial-eyes-generative-ai-chinas-military-intelligence.

[7] Tong Zujing [童祖静] et al., “缘何？两行车辙印竟让全军覆没…… [Why? Two Lines of Tire Tracks Led to the Complete Annihilation of the Army…],” 中国军网 [China Military Online], June 21, 2022, hxxp://www.mod.gov.cn/gfbw/tp_214132/tbtj_214138/4913528.html.

[8] Liu Jianwei [刘建伟] et al., “第83集团军某旅年度军事训练总结大会，抓训‘三问’成焦点 [At the Annual Military Training Summary Meeting of a Brigade of the 83rd Group Army, Three Key Questions Regarding Training Became the Focus].”

[9] Tong Zujing, “Why? Two Lines of Tire Tracks Led to the Complete Annihilation of the Army.”

[10] Liu Jinghang [刘憬杭], “第75集团军某旅利用新体制编制优势锤炼攻防硬功 [A Brigade of the 75th Group Army Leveraged the Advantages of Its New Organizational Structure to Hone Its Offensive and Defensive Skills],” 解放军报 [PLA Daily], April 11, 2019, hxxps://www.xinhuanet.com/mil/2019-04/11/c_1210105185.htm; “无形战场，过招电磁蓝军——第七十五集团军某旅实战化对抗演练见闻 [An Invisible Battlefield, a Clash with the Electromagnetic Blue Force—a Glimpse into a Realistic Combat Exercise Conducted by a Brigade of the 75th Group Army],” 解放军报 [PLA Daily], August 4, 2019, hxxps://military.cctv.com/2019/08/04/ARTIjAMB9iVfSD8RU4GQMMae190804.shtml.

[11] Chen Yu [陈羽] and Huang Zijuan [黄子娟], “破解练兵场上的‘X因素’ [Deciphering the ‘X Factor’ on the Training Ground],” 解放军报 [PLA Daily], May 21, 2020, hxxp://military.people.com.cn/n1/2020/0521/c1011-31717682.html.

[12] He Fei [何飞] and Guo Zhiyu [郭志宇], “‘苦’出来的有线尖兵 [The Wire Vanguards Tempered through ’Hardship’],” 中国军网 [China Military Online], June 18, 2020, hxxp://www.81.cn/jfjbmap/content/2020-06/18/content_264103.htm.

[13] Jiang Feng [江峰] and Yang Mingyue [杨明月], “陆军工程大学通信士官学校：为实习学员构建线上学习平台-今日头条 [Army Engineering University Communications NCO School: Building an Online Learning Platform for Trainees],” 中国军网 [China Military Online], November 18, 2024, hxxps://m.gmw.cn/toutiao/2024-11/18/content_37683151.htm.

[14] Liu Jianwei, et al., “At the Annual Military Training Summary Meeting of a Brigade of the 83rd Group Army, Three Key Questions Regarding Training Became the Focus.”

[15] “十九大时光：3名基层官兵聆听十九大报告的真情感悟–十九大专题报道 [The 19th CCP National Congress: Three Grassroots Soldiers’ Sincere Reflections on Listening to the Report of the 19th CCP National Congress],” 解放军报 [PLA Daily], October 19, 2017, hxxps://cpc.people.com.cn/19th/n1/2017/1019/c414305-29596417.html.

[16] Gao Xuyao [高旭尧], “联训议训，为战斗力提质增效 [Joint Training and Discussion, Improving Quality and Efficiency for Combat Effectiveness],” 解放军报 [PLA Daily], March 25, 2019, hxxp://www.81.cn/jfjbmap/content/2019-03/25/content_230113.htm (website no longer available; PDF copy available upon request).

[17] “《东方新观察》：解放军装备了多少无人机？这些解放军的无人机，都装备在哪些部队 [Easterm Observer: How Many Drones Does the PLA Have? Which Units Are These PLA Drones Deployed To?],” 知乎 [Zhihu], December 4, 2022, hxxps://zhuanlan.zhihu.com/p/589271325.

[18] Gao Xuyao, “Joint Training and Discussion, Improving Quality and Efficiency for Combat Effectiveness.”

[19] 解放军报 [PLA Daily], “无形战场，过招电磁蓝军——第七十五集团军某旅实战化对抗演练见闻 [An Invisible Battlefield, a Clash with the Electromagnetic Blue Force—a Glimpse into a Realistic Combat Exercise Conducted by a Brigade of the 75th Group Army].”

[20] Qiu Chengliang [仇成梁], “走进站岗官兵的退伍时刻 [Stepping into the Retirement Moment of the Guards],” 中国军网 [China Military Online], September 4, 2018, hxxp://www.mod.gov.cn/gfbw/tp_214132/zgjr/4824139.html.

[21] 东部战区微信号编辑部 [PLA Eastern Theater Command Official WeChat], “中秋节，突然响起紧急集合号 [On Mid-Autumn Festival, an Emergency Assembly Call Suddenly Sounded],” 微信号编辑部 [Weixin Official Accounts Platform], September 11, 2022, hxxps://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/8zoOd6zESGokMsyRJTJrzA.

[22] Academy of Military Science All-Military Terminology Management Committee [全军军事术语管理委员会], People’s Liberation Army Military Terminology [中国人民解放军军语] (Academy of Military Science Press [军事科学出版社], 2011).

[23] Qiu Chengliang [仇成梁] et al., “朱日和演兵场——炊事员王耀彬：我想去阵地看看 [Zhurihe Military Training Ground – Cook Wang Yaobin: I Want to Go and See the Position],” 中国网 [China Network], September 13, 2017, hxxp://military.china.com.cn/2017-09/13/content_41573572.htm.

[24] Joshua Arostegui and J. R. Sessions, “PLA Army Logistics: New Organization, Same Challenges,” in PLA Logistics and Sustainment: PLA Conference 2022 (US Army War College Press, 2023), hxxps://press.armywarcollege.edu/monographs/958/.

[25] Wang Boran [王渤然] and Wang Yue [王越], “‘创新突破’为何沦为‘浮花虚果’？调研后他有了这一反思 [Why Has ‘Innovation and Breakthroughs’ Degenerated into ‘Superficial Achievements’? This Is the Reflection He Had After Conducting Research],” 中国军网 [China Military Online], November 21, 2024, hxxp://www.81.cn/yw_208727/16353287.html; Arostegui and Sessions, “PLA Army Logistics: New Organization, Same Challenges.”

[26] Wang Boran and Wang Yue, “Why Has ‘Innovation and Breakthroughs’ Degenerated into ‘Superficial Achievements’? This Is the Reflection He Had After Conducting Research”; Arostegui and Sessions, “PLA Army Logistics: New Organization, Same Challenges.”

[27] Arostegui and Sessions, “PLA Army Logistics: New Organization, Same Challenges.”

[28] Arostegui and Sessions, “PLA Army Logistics: New Organization, Same Challenges.”

[29] “第79集团军某旅作战通信实施分级保障制度 [A Brigade of the 79th Group Army Implements a Tiered Support System for Operational Communications],” 解放军报 [PLA Daily], May 30, 2022, hxxp://military.people.com.cn/n1/2022/0530/c1011-32433796.html.

[30] Gao Xuyao, “Joint Training and Discussion, Improving Quality and Efficiency for Combat Effectiveness.”

[31] Gao Xuyao, Joint Training and Discussion, Improving Quality and Efficiency for Combat Effectiveness.”

[32] Arostegui and Sessions, “PLA Army Logistics: New Organization, Same Challenges”; Wang Boran [王渤然] and Wang Yue [王越], “‘创新突破’为何沦为‘浮花虚果’？调研后他有了这一反思 [Why Has ‘Innovation and Breakthroughs’ Degenerated into ‘Superficial Achievements’? This Is the Reflection He Had After Conducting Research].”

[33] Arostegui and Sessions, “PLA Army Logistics: New Organization, Same Challenges.”